jack_ryder (
jack_ryder) wrote2007-02-06 08:02 am
Fixing the Aurealis Awards - a modest proposal
There's a discussion/shouting match about the Aurealis Award judging going on at the moment, that I'm not going to link to because you all know who you are.
What surprises me though (and I'm probably being very naive here) is that no-one has floated the obvious solution(s) -
So, a little background for those who don't know/care about the current "controversies" - for me there are two:
a) Two judges went public (kinda, sorta) with their dislike of flash fiction and a supporter of flash fiction has accused them of shutting out flash fiction from the judging out of personal bias and generally unprofessional behaviour. No, I'm not going to link to the arguments - anyone feeling I've misrepresented it (or them) can argue in the comments
b) A graphic novel (at over 120 pages) was nominated and won best Young Adult short story. (The Arrival by Shaun Tan).
To my mind b) damages the credibility of the Aurealis Awards (which are, after all, the local equivalent of the Nebula Awards) more than a).
So, to a) first.
If there is a predominance of flash fiction amongst the eligible works for an Aurealis that year, then a separate award for flash fiction (just one - across all genres) should be instituted. Or maybe have one every year with the provision for a "no award".
My reasoning is, despite some protests to the contrary, an author is doing something fundamentally different in a 500 word story to a 2,000 word or more one. The comment has already been made that flash fiction is more analogous to a haiku, and in poetry competitions there is often a separate award for haikus, or they are ineligible because of length.
But for there to be an award, flash fiction must be a strong and recognisable part of the body of Australian fantastic writing, not just available from a few venues lest it become mere a best of (insert flash fiction website here) award.
Now b), similar solution.
I haven't read everything this year (or even much Australia fantastic writing) but Shaun Tan's The Arrival is a work of genius and it diminishes both it and the Aurealis Awards to be win an award in a category that's not really relevant. Does anyone really believe that the biggest audience for The Arrival is a YA one? And the argument that it qualifies for short story because there are only two words in it (i.e. the title) is ludicrous and diminishes the other, more qualified, nominees for YA short story.
Now, a bit of history here. Apparently there used to be two awards (the Convenor's award and the Peter McNamara award) and one would cover works that added greatly to Australian fantastic literature and the other went to a person that added greatly to Australian fantastic literature. Those awards were collapsed into one, and Bill Congreve won the Convenor's Award this year. And not before time.
However, this does kind of leave works like The Arrival and other non or meta-textual works out in the cold. I'd argue that Deborah Biancotti's Surrender 1: Rope Artist (sort of link) should be in a different category as well because of it's use of web technology.
So, in short, my argument is that there needs to be a Best Other Medium category (and a better name for it) in the Aurealis Awards to take into account The Arrival and Surrender 1: Rope Artist and movies and theatre pieces and television and comics and games and any other medium that could possibly add to the body of Australian Fantastic work.
Yeah, I know, a bitch to judge and it's not comparing apples with apples.
But, you know, we have to start somewhere, and there's going to be more and more work that needs to be recognised that will be outside the currently limited categories of the Aurealis Awards.
What surprises me though (and I'm probably being very naive here) is that no-one has floated the obvious solution(s) -
So, a little background for those who don't know/care about the current "controversies" - for me there are two:
a) Two judges went public (kinda, sorta) with their dislike of flash fiction and a supporter of flash fiction has accused them of shutting out flash fiction from the judging out of personal bias and generally unprofessional behaviour. No, I'm not going to link to the arguments - anyone feeling I've misrepresented it (or them) can argue in the comments
b) A graphic novel (at over 120 pages) was nominated and won best Young Adult short story. (The Arrival by Shaun Tan).
To my mind b) damages the credibility of the Aurealis Awards (which are, after all, the local equivalent of the Nebula Awards) more than a).
So, to a) first.
If there is a predominance of flash fiction amongst the eligible works for an Aurealis that year, then a separate award for flash fiction (just one - across all genres) should be instituted. Or maybe have one every year with the provision for a "no award".
My reasoning is, despite some protests to the contrary, an author is doing something fundamentally different in a 500 word story to a 2,000 word or more one. The comment has already been made that flash fiction is more analogous to a haiku, and in poetry competitions there is often a separate award for haikus, or they are ineligible because of length.
But for there to be an award, flash fiction must be a strong and recognisable part of the body of Australian fantastic writing, not just available from a few venues lest it become mere a best of (insert flash fiction website here) award.
Now b), similar solution.
I haven't read everything this year (or even much Australia fantastic writing) but Shaun Tan's The Arrival is a work of genius and it diminishes both it and the Aurealis Awards to be win an award in a category that's not really relevant. Does anyone really believe that the biggest audience for The Arrival is a YA one? And the argument that it qualifies for short story because there are only two words in it (i.e. the title) is ludicrous and diminishes the other, more qualified, nominees for YA short story.
Now, a bit of history here. Apparently there used to be two awards (the Convenor's award and the Peter McNamara award) and one would cover works that added greatly to Australian fantastic literature and the other went to a person that added greatly to Australian fantastic literature. Those awards were collapsed into one, and Bill Congreve won the Convenor's Award this year. And not before time.
However, this does kind of leave works like The Arrival and other non or meta-textual works out in the cold. I'd argue that Deborah Biancotti's Surrender 1: Rope Artist (sort of link) should be in a different category as well because of it's use of web technology.
So, in short, my argument is that there needs to be a Best Other Medium category (and a better name for it) in the Aurealis Awards to take into account The Arrival and Surrender 1: Rope Artist and movies and theatre pieces and television and comics and games and any other medium that could possibly add to the body of Australian Fantastic work.
Yeah, I know, a bitch to judge and it's not comparing apples with apples.
But, you know, we have to start somewhere, and there's going to be more and more work that needs to be recognised that will be outside the currently limited categories of the Aurealis Awards.

no subject
Thanks very much for the clarification - it makes a lot more sense now.
I have major issues with its marketing, as I think this book deserves a larger audience. But then, they're the ones with the focus groups and the sales projections and the massive need for risk reduction. I consider it a major work, and it's not being promoted as such.
You weren't, I just think it's the implication of the categories The Arrival's been placed in. I was hoping I'd qualified the statement enough so you knew that you weren't included.
I agree, I just didn't think I'd challenged that idea, so I couldn't see what prompted the statement.
Unfortunately, whilst I feel that it's the publisher that has misrepresented The Arrival (through the marketing, but not the packaging which is brilliant) it appears that the restrictions on the Aurealis categories have helped in reinforcing that misrepresentation - that The Arrival is aimed at children and young adults and not one of those books:
no subject
I have issues with how quite a few books are being marketed right now. I'm not sure that all the publicity people are seeing what the editors are seeing - good books get signed up by some of the big houses and then they fade from view.
The only way we are going to get The Arrival seen as a classic is to get people to pick it up and read it. Maybe there needs to be a "Why I love The Arrival" meme? Except that it would mainly reach people who already know.
no subject
It's going to have a US edition this year, and that's where it may really take off.