jack_ryder (
jack_ryder) wrote2006-09-12 10:18 pm
That Connie and Harlan thing
Here's the video
(to me, it looks like he's taken shtick too far, maybe. It's like he's channelling Jerry Lewis, if Jerry Lewis was dead, that is.)
(to me, it looks like he's taken shtick too far, maybe. It's like he's channelling Jerry Lewis, if Jerry Lewis was dead, that is.)

no subject
This is by way of saying: I understand why people want to see what hppened before commenting, but there's no way in hell I could, would, or feel even slightly inclined to.
no subject
Of course, looks have nothing to do with how people feel, but your statement above implies I have no right to post this as I'm only perpetuating the crime, rather than trying to put it into context.
Oh well, in that case I may have well posted the Steve Irwin death video (http://youtube.com/watch?v=7iopjg_9E_o)
or, you know, a model have her throat crushed by a policeman.
no subject
Needless to say, Mr Ellison needs to watch where his hands go (particularly as he has a track record of inappropriate physical contact). Accidently or otherwise, it's wrong to touch people (male or female) in certain places.
What is it about breasts lately? An article in Salon's Braodsheet reported that people were complaining about a cover photo on a BREASTFEEDING magazine that showed a baby feeding. Why is a naked breast (especially one that is doing what it was designed for) more upsetting than extreme violence?
Also: your Iatalian Vogue thing is on Salon.
http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/
no subject
Morons. On so many levels, morons.
no subject
no subject
The absence of such evidence only opens the door to ignorant and uninformed comment.
no subject
That's what I thought, and so did Jack_Ryder. Here is the evidence, evaluate yourself.
Frankly next to the Diane Brimball case, Connie and Harlan are a storm in a teacup. There is far far worse things out there....get indignant over them and help fight the real problem.
no subject
Um, no, sorry if it came across that way, that wasn't my intent. It exists, and is public, and of course you have a right to post it. It was more an explanation of why I won't view it and couldn't post it as you have done, not a judgement of your action.