jack_ryder (
jack_ryder) wrote2011-04-27 06:49 am
Entry tags:
Julie Taymor's "The Tempest"
Get this out on DVD so you can just watch Helen Mirren as Prospera, Chris Cooper as Antonio. David Strathairn as Alonso, Alan Cumming as Sebastian and Tom Conti as Gonzalo. Whilst Alfred Molina gives a great performance as Stephano, he does it in the company of Russell Brand's Trinculo.
Reeve Carney as Ferdinand is completely out of his depth - it's like he won some kind of competition in drama school.
The CGI (mainly Ben Wishaw's Ariel - which has reasonable performance under the pixels) is sometimes good, sometimes risible and Taymor cannot prevent herself from shouting her themes from the rooftops BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT YOU DO WITH ART AIMED AT AMERICAN AUDIENCES!
If Mirren's performance wasn't so good, I'd say it's not worth seeing (unless you're curious, of course.) But Mirren is excellent, her Prospera survives being drowned out by Taymor's directorial sound and fury, so this adaptation is not entirely missable.
But it wasn't as good as the first Tempest I'd seen with a female Prospero.
Reeve Carney as Ferdinand is completely out of his depth - it's like he won some kind of competition in drama school.
The CGI (mainly Ben Wishaw's Ariel - which has reasonable performance under the pixels) is sometimes good, sometimes risible and Taymor cannot prevent herself from shouting her themes from the rooftops BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT YOU DO WITH ART AIMED AT AMERICAN AUDIENCES!
If Mirren's performance wasn't so good, I'd say it's not worth seeing (unless you're curious, of course.) But Mirren is excellent, her Prospera survives being drowned out by Taymor's directorial sound and fury, so this adaptation is not entirely missable.
But it wasn't as good as the first Tempest I'd seen with a female Prospero.

no subject
Helen Mirren doesn't impress me as much these days as she used to. Apparently she wants to play Hamlet. Now that would certainly be gimmick casting. The scary thing is, it will probably happen.
no subject
no subject
Hamlet.
The whole "I'm going to make a devastating feminist critique by casting women in men's roles" is embarrassingly 1970s though. To me it smacks of a lack of real confidence, a kind of apologising for being female, which to me seems more anti-feminist than feminist.
no subject
no subject
It's a tough call if you have low tolerance to Greenaway - it's certainly worth seeing Gielgud's definitive performance (I'd equate it with Paul Schofield's Lear) but there's a lot of Greenaway you have to get through.