jack_ryder: (Default)
jack_ryder ([personal profile] jack_ryder) wrote2007-11-22 08:19 am
Entry tags:

Front page of SMH this morning


Front page of SMH this morning, originally uploaded by JackRyder.

I thought there was a media blackout on election ads?

(At least it shows the proper authorisation - unlike the ads that have shown up on Facebook)

Thanks for the correction.

[identity profile] jack-ryder.livejournal.com 2007-11-22 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
Here's the official stance:

from The Australian Media section (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,24897,22604076-7582,00.html) )

"Our rules do not apply to internet advertising," ACMA spokesman Donald Robertson said yesterday.

"Our rules apply to organisations that hold broadcasting licences. The blackout is given effect by a licence condition on broadcasting licensees. It covers radio and TV but not their websites. You don't have to have a licence to operate a website."

AEC spokeswoman Bernadette O'Meara confirmed ACMA's interpretation, which will enable all parties to run internet ads in the three days up to and including polling day on November 24.

Newspapers have been the traditional beneficiary of the blackout, as they are also exempt.


Still - it was an effing intrusive ad (one of those flash things that extended across the whole page.)

And it still doesn't fix the problem of the Facebook ads that don't show the boilerplate "authorised by" statements as required by law (though the ad shown above does - eventually.)

Re: Thanks for the correction.

[identity profile] capnoblivious.livejournal.com 2007-11-22 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
Still - it was an effing intrusive ad (one of those flash things that extended across the whole page.)

They're really ugly ads - desperate and crass.